Frank and Fiona go into a restaurant inside a hotel at which they are not staying as guests.On their way in, Frank hands up his coat and hat in a coat rack by the entrance to the restaurant.After they are seated, a busboy offers to check Fiona's fur coat for her, and she assents.A short time later, the busboy returns with a coat check ticket which he gives to Fiona.After a wonderful meal, Frank discovers that his hat and coat are missing from the coat rack, as is the fur that was checked by the busboy into the hotel's coat checkroom.They sue the restaurant for breach of the bailment agreement with regard to both articles of clothing and for strict liability, claiming a special bailment existed.Will either theory of liability be successful?Explain fully.