Frieda is a landscape architect and does absolutely beautiful work. She does commercial as well as residential work. Sydney contracts with Frieda to landscape her brand new $30,000$ square foot mansion. The contract includes all of the flowers, bushes, shrubs, and trees worth $$150,000$; two marble water features worth $$75,000,$ having been imported from Italy; two pergolas and one gazebo, all costing $$25,000.$ Labor for the landscaping will total $$40,000$ and Frieda$$s fee is an additional $$25,000.$

Problems begin to occur nearly as soon as the contract is signed and Sydney paid Frieda the $$45,000$ deposit. First of all, two hundred azalea bushes arrived; both Sydney and Frieda inspected them and found them to be in perfect condition...well, almost. After they were planted and bloomed a month later, they turned out to be red azaleas. Sydney specifically wanted pink ones and stated so in the contract.

The water features, though beautiful marble and meeting every specification, turned out to have come from a French marble pit, not an Italian one, though the French minimum site was owned by an Italian company and ultimate seller. Frieda had accepted the shipment of the original Italian ones but when they proved to be defected, she told Sydney, and Frieda replaced them with the French marble; she did not tell Sydney of the $$French connection.$$

Finally, in the middle of the construction, the new water line laid by the city for the new house burst $($nothing to do with anything Frieda was doing$)$; the resulting yard flood delayed Frieda$$s work by two weeks. Though she finished a week early, due to the flood, the yard was not done in time for Sydney$$s fundraising garden party for the $$Preservation of Rich People$$s Gardens,$$ a nonprofit charity. The cancelation deprived the charity of nearly $$20,000$ in donations.

Which of the following is a correct statement?