From a survey that Alika conducted for her veterinary medicine class, she found that 365 households out of a total of 1000 households claimed to own at least one dog or cat. Alika constructed a 95% confidence interval in order to predict the population proportion,

Alika concluded that:

1) It was Ok to use the sample proportion p = 365/1000 = 0.365 to construct this confidence interval;

2) The proportion of households in her whole state that would claim to own a dog or cat would be between 33.52% and 39.48%; and

3) She was glad that she had not chosen a larger sample because a sample greater than n = 1000 would have caused the confidence interval to become wider and less precise.

Do you agree with these conclusions? Why do you agree? Do you disagree with these conclusions? Why do you disagree? Be specific; be clear.