Further to the previous question (leaving the company Christmas party drunk). It would be FALSE to say the victim hit by the drunk driver could sue: Select one: O a. the drunk driver for negligence O b. the drunk driver for an intentional tort, as he clearly meant to hit the victim with his car O c. the employer based on the idea of vicarious liability, but you would have to show going to the company Christmas party is in being in the course of employment to make it work. O d. the owner of the vehicle if the owner of the vehicle is a different person than the drunk driver