Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Futterman operated a cotton factory and employed Dana Marra as a general purchasing agent to travel through the southern states to purchase cotton. Futterman telegraphed

Futterman operated a cotton factory and employed Dana Marra as a general purchasing agent to travel through the southern states to purchase cotton. Futterman telegraphed Marra instructions from day to day as to the price to be paid for cotton. Marra entered a cotton district in which she had not previously done business and represented that she was purchasing cotton for Futterman. Although directed by Futterman to pay no more than $0.25 per pound, Marra bought cotton from Anderson at $0.30 per pound, which was the prevailing offering price at that time. Futterman refused to take the cotton. Under these circumstances, which of the following is true? Marra has no potential liability. The negation of actual authority to make the purchase effectively eliminates any liability for Futterman. Futterman is liable on the contract. Futterman is not liable on the contract

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Principles of Economics

Authors: Robert Frank, Ben Bernanke

5th edition

73511404, 978-0073511405

Students also viewed these Law questions