GBB Developers Ltd. hired a firm of architects to design a building. The architects, in turn, engaged a firm of engineers who conducted deep soil tests on the ground. After the design work was complete and the building was constructed. the building moved causing extensive structural damage. In addition, when the building moved, some scaffolding attached to the building came loose, fell to the ground and destroyed one of GBB's delivery vehicles. GBB sued the architects for breach of contract and the engineers for negligence. The court held both defendants liable and ordered them to pay damages to cover the cost of remedial work. The court however stated that damages, relating to the destruction of the delivery vehicle were too remote. Which of the following best describes what the court meant when it said that the damages were too remote? O The damages did not occur in the same jurisdiction 0 The damages were not foreseeable O The damages were not caused by the defendant's negligence O The damages are not payable because the defendants did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff