General Equity Corporation enters into a contract with Honi, who agrees to create artwork for General$$s main office building. Honi delays and eventually refuses to perform. Meanwhile, General contracts to sell the building to Ideal Investments, Inc., but before the transaction is complete, Jewel Funds Company offers to pay a higher price. General refuses to transfer the building to Ideal. In separate suits by General against Honi and by Ideal against General, each plaintiff seeks specific performance. How might the court rule in each case, and why?

Question $7$ options:

The work contracted by Honi will most not be enforced as the courts look at contracts $$for personal services$$ as the courts will not monitor the performance and basically looks at this type of enforcement as forced labor. The contract for the sale of property, however, will most likely be enforced because of the uniqueness of $$real property$$; that is$,$ no two pieces of real property are the same so a monetary award would not be satisfactory.

The work contracted by Honi will most likely be enforced as the courts look at contracts through the concept of $$specific performance$.$ The contract for the sale of property, however, will most likely be enforced because of the uniqueness of $$real property$$; that is$,$ no two pieces of real property are the same so a monetary award would not be satisfactory.

The work contracted by Honi will most likely be enforced as the courts look at contracts through the concept of $$specific performance$.$ The contract for the sale of property, however, will most likely not be enforced as similar property might be available in the area.