Question
Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted? A random sample of n 1 =258people in Chicago ages18-25showed that r 1 =46said
Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted? A random sample ofn1=258people in Chicago ages18-25showed thatr1=46said yes. Another random sample ofn2=277people in Chicago ages35-45showed thatr2=75said yes. Does this indicate that the population proportion of trusting people in Chicago is higher for the older group? Use= 0.05.
(a)What is the level of significance?
(b) State the null and alternate hypotheses.
- H0:p1=p2;H1:p1<p2
- H0:p1<p2;H1:p1=p2
- H0:p1=p2;H1:p1p2
- H0:p1=p2;H1:p1>p2
(c)What sampling distribution will you use? What assumptions are you making?
- The Student'st. The number of trials is sufficiently large.
- The standard normal. We assume the population distributions are approximately normal.
- The Student'st. We assume the population distributions are approximately normal.
- The standard normal. The number of trials is sufficiently large.
- What is the value of the sample test statistic? (Test the differencep1p2. Do not use rounded values. Round your final answer to two decimal places.)
(d)Find (or estimate) theP-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
(e) Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to theP-value.
(f)Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level?
- At the= 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.
- At the= 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.
- At the= 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.
- At the= 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.
(g)Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.
- Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the proportion of trusting people in Chicago is higher in the older group.
- Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the proportion of trusting people in Chicago is higher in the older group.
- Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the proportion of trusting people in Chicago is higher in the older group.
- Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the proportion of trusting people in Chicago is higher in the older group.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started