Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Goods vs. Services Yates contracted with Waterworks, Inc. to have an above ground pool installed in his backyard. Waterworks specialized in the sale and construction

Goods vs. Services

Yates contracted with Waterworks, Inc. to have an above ground pool installed in his backyard. Waterworks specialized in the sale and construction of pools.The two parties entered into a contract that called for Waterworks to "furnish all labor and materials to construct a Wavecrest brand pool, and furnish and install pool with vinyl liners."The total cost for materials and labor was $3,690.There was no breakdown of costs between labor and materials.After the pool was installed, its sides began bowing out, the 2" x 4" wooden supports became rotted and misaligned, tilting the pool.Yates brought suit alleging that Waterworks had violated several provisions of Article 2 of the UCC.

a) Using the IRAC method, discuss whether the transaction was one involving "goods" making it subject to Article 2 of the UCC.

b) If we assume that Article 2 applies, under what warranty theory (or theories) might a lawsuit be brought (IRAC not required)?

4. Is there a contract and/or breach under the UCC?

Flint, a retail seller of TV's, ordered 100 Color-X TV's from Martin, a manufacturer. The order specified the price and that the TV's are to be shipped by Hummingbird Express on or before October 30th.Martin received the order on October 5th.On October 8th, Martin wrote Flint a letter indicating that the order was received and that the TV's will be shipped as directed at the specified price.Flint received this letter on October 10th.On October 28th, Martin, in preparing the shipment, discovers it has only 90 Color-X TV's in stock.Martin ships the 90 Color-X TV's as well as 10 TV's of a different model, stating clearly on the invoice that the 10 different TV's are being shipped only as acommodation.Flint claims that Martin is in breach of contract.Martin claims that the shipment was not an acceptance, and, therefore, no contract was formed. Applying the IRAC method, discuss who is correct and why.

5. Battle of the Forms

Hiram Paint Company mailed a purchase order to ABC Can Company requesting 50,000 new paint cans.The order form contained a condition stating, "The buyer may reject any defective goods withing 20 days of delivery."ABC sent a return letter confirming the order.The letter contained a condition stating, "An objection to goods shipped must be made in writing within 4 days of receipt of the goods."On the 8th day after receipt of the cans, Hiram filed an objection because 5,000 cans were defective.Applying the IRAC method, discuss whether Hiram's objection was legally valid.

6. Determining Priority

Ramirez bought some used manufacturing equipment from Hurdle for $3,000, paying $1,000 in cash and the balance in a promissory note secured by a security agreement. Before Hurdle filed the financing statement, Ramirez used the equipment as collateral to obtain a loan from Allen, who immediately filed a financing statement.If Ramirez does not repay the loans, who has first priority in the equipment, Hurdle or Allen (IRAC not required)?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Essential Criminal Law

Authors: Matthew Lippman

3rd Edition

154435598X, 978-1544355986

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

What is an asset? A liability? Net worth, or capital?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What impediments deal with regulators?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What are their performance levels?

Answered: 1 week ago