Griffith UNIVERSITY Queensland, Australia Engaging Australia and the Asia-Pacific (1005GBS_3228/G... > Assignments > A1: Short Response Essay - 20% Trimester 3 2022 Account Home Announcements Due Monday by 10:00 Points 20 Submitting a file upload File Types doc, docx, and pdf Dashboard Course Profile Modules Assessment 1 Courses Marks Short Response Essay Calendar Microsoft Teams meetings Inbox Microsoft Teams classes Student Support History PebblePad Studio ? Help K - 20% Task Description Provide a short response essay of 500 words to reflect on the importance of Australia's First Peoples in Australian history, culture, and business, and its linkages to Asia. You will need to choose one of the topics below to respond to: OPTION A: Australia's First Nation's People compared to the Asia-Pacific Discuss the importance of awareness, appreciation and inclusion of Australia's First Peoples to the history and culture of Australia. How does this compare to indigenous people in the Asia-Pacific region. Select one country and a related indigenous group in the Asia-Pacific region as part of the comparison. OPTION B: Unpacking First Nation's People Business Select a current Australian indigenous company, business, or organization. Compare and discuss this business to non-indigenous businesses focusing on the business model, engagement, meaning operations and purpose. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The aim of this exercise is to develop a short reflection that outlines your response to the questions. You will need to use literature to support your responses to the questions. When you present research, make sure you are critical- we discuss 'being critical' in our workshops. All research presented must be referenced properly referenced using APA referencing, with in-text references and a reference list. Submission Details This submission link allows for draft attempts, providing you with the opportunity to check text matching for unintended plagiarism. Note: it is acceptable for correctly cited items such as references and direct quotations to be included in the matching % given. Note: The last submitted file at the due date will be the assessment that is marked. Assignments can be submitted via the Start Assignment button on the top right of this page. Word limit: 500 words (+/-10%) You need to use a minimum of four (4) sources. This can include journal articles, book chapters, government reports, websites and the modules. In-text references ARE included in word limit Do not use first person The first three modules are very useful in completing this task. To reference module content, please use the following in your reference list: Griffith University (2021 or 2022). Engaging Australia and the Asia Pacific: Module X. Accessed XXX (date) from xxxxxxx Tips for Success We discuss the assignment items extensively in class- it is essential that you attend to ask questions and join in the activities Please attend the consultation hours with your tutors if you need further clarity If you should require an extension, please apply via the following link https://www.griffith.edu.au/students/student-review-appeal/information- sheets-and-resources/assignment-extensions Need assistance with structure, researching and referencing, contact the Library via this link https://intranet.secure.griffith.edu.au/library/forms/help A1: Position Statement Rubric Criteria Discussion of Australia's First Peoples Ratings Start Assignment 6 to >5.09 pts Excellent In-depth discussion of First Peoples themes and key concepts relevant to all elements in the chosen option. Information is presented through an insightful critical analysis with a strong position evident. 5.09 to >4.49 pts Very Good Provides a very good discussion of the key themes and concepts relevant to Australia's First Peoples in the chosen option. Presents strong critical analysis of different perspectives to develop a clear position. 4.49 to >3.89 pts Good Describes some of the key concepts and themes in depth. Presents some critical analysis of perspectives. Position is implied through the discussion. 3.89 to >2.99 pts Satisfactory Provides a broad description of some of the key concepts of Australia's First Peoples. Discusses some elements in detail. Limited critical analysis. 2.99 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory No discussion of importance of Australia's First Peoples. Discussion does not focus on elements of chosen option. No critical analysis. No clear position or opinion. Critical comparison 6 to >5.09 pts Excellent The critical comparison flows logically from the discussion and outlines relevant and suitable aspects pending on chosen option. Future- focused solutions considering the various aspects. 5.09 to >4.49 pts Very Good The critical comparison is relevant to the selected cases and provides clear insights. Future-focused solutions consider some aspects. 4.49 to >3.89 pts Good Outlines relevant comparison and includes some critical analysis with limited future-focused solutions. 3.89 to >2.99 pts Satisfactory Provides general comparison with limited analysis and no future solutions. 2.99 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Comparison is absent or limited in considering various aspects. No reflection of the comparison. Written expression 3 to >2.55 pts Excellent Written expression is excellent with no errors. Ideas are arranged in an extremely logical, structured and coherent manner. Within +/- 10% of word limit. 2.55 to >2.25 pts Very Good Some minor errors with spelling, grammar or sentence structure. The ideas are arranged in a fairly logical, structured and coherent manner. Within +/- 10% of word limit. 2.25 to >1.95 pts Good Several errors with expression, including grammatical or spelling errors. The ideas are arranged in a logical, somewhat structured and coherent manner. Within +/- 10% word limit. 1.95 to >1.5 pts Satisfactory Numerous spelling/grammatical errors. The ideas appear less logical and structured. Informal/ colloquial language used at times. Word count is +/-20%. 1.5 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Writing quality affects coherence of information. Extensive formatting errors. There is little, if any, coherent structure to the document. Word count is greater than +/- 20%. Sources/ evidence 3 to >2.55 pts Excellent Utilises current, appropriate and credible sources which strongly support the argument throughout. Exceeds required number of sources. 2.55 to >2.25 pts Very Good Utilises current, appropriate and credible sources which mostly support the argument throughout. Exceeds required number of sources. 2.25 to >1.95 pts Good Utilises some, appropriate and credible sources which at times support the argument throughout Uses required number of sources. 1.95 to >1.5 pts Satisfactory Utilises limited current, appropriate and credible sources which mostly support the argument throughout Uses required number of sources. 1.5 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Utilises no current, appropriate and credible sources. Does not use required number of sources. Referencing Previous 2 to >1.7 pts Excellent No errors with referencing and uses required style. 1.7 to >1.5 pts Very Good Minor errors with referencing but uses required style. 1.5 to 1.3 pts Good Several minor errors with referencing in-text or reference list. 1.3 to >1.0 pts Satisfactory Several major errors with referencing in-text or reference list. 1 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory No referencing in-text or reference list. Not used required style. Pts 6 pts 6 pts 3 pts 3 pts 2 pts Total Points: 20 Next Immersive Reader