Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Gringo's Restaurant is a small restaurant located in a Mesa, Arizona, neighborhood shopping center that has a grocery store (chain) as its anchor tenant. Carl

image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
Gringo's Restaurant is a small restaurant located in a Mesa, Arizona, neighborhood shopping center that has a grocery store (chain) as its anchor tenant. Carl Williams owns Gringo's and has just negotiated its sale to Wilma Freestone. The covenant not to compete provides that Williams will not open a competing restaurant anywhere within a two-mile radius of Gringo's. The noncompete covenant is: too restrictive and is a violation of the Sherman Act. not subject to review so long as it is part of the sales contract. probably reasonable and enforceable. void Homer, Inc. is the western regional distributor for Plato Ice Cream. Homer charges grocers in California $3.00 per half gallon but charges Utah grocers only $2.00 per half gallon. Homer says the Utah ice cream market is much more competitive and he has to meet the market. Utah competitors charge between $2.50 and $2.75 per half gallon. Homer: has engaged in price discrimination. is simply meeting the competition. is exempt from Robinson-Patman because of interstate sales. none of the above Doug Everett worked for Columbia Power as a consultant for businesses in reducing their power bills. Columbia terminated Doug and provided notice to all of his customers that Doug was no longer working with Columbia. A business that had heard about Doug from one of his former clients called Doug and asked him to help with reducing power bills of their offices and plants. Doug still had his materials from Columbia and negotiated a contract with the business for Columbia to provide certain equipment to the business and also for specific new rate plans for the business. Columbia did not know of the agreement and now refuses to honor it. Which of the following statements is correct? Columbia is not liable on the contract with the business because Doug's actual (express and implied authority) had terminated. Columbia is not liable because a former employee cannot negotiate contracts with customers after his termination. Columbia is liable on the contract because Columbia did not give general notice of termination. Doug is liable on the contract, but not Columbia

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Students also viewed these Accounting questions