Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Haig Corporation, a manufacturer, is a multistate taxpayer that has nexus with States 1 and 2. During the taxable year, Haig's net sales were $2,000,000;

Haig Corporation, a manufacturer, is a multistate taxpayer that has nexus with States 1 and 2. During the taxable year, Haig's net sales were $2,000,000; $1,200,000 of these sales were made in State 1, and $800,000 were made in State 2. The corporation also received $300,000 from the rental of nonbusiness real property located in State 1. Both states employ a three-factor apportionment formula under which sales, property, and payroll are equally weighted. However, the states do not agree on the definition of apportionable income. Under State 1's tax provisions, nonbusiness rent income is allocable and business income is apportionable, while State 2 requires a corporation to apportion all of its (business and nonbusiness) income.

The sales factor for each of the states is ??% for State 1 and ??% for State 2.

What is the sales factor for State 1 and State 2? Please explain.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

International Finance Transactions Policy And Regulation

Authors: Hal S. Scott

11th Edition

1587787083, 9781587787089

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions