Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Harlick v. Blue Shield of California 1. Who were the parties involved in the case? (plaintiff/defendant/respondent/petitioner) Jeanene Harlick the plaintiff and Blue Shield of California

Harlick v. Blue Shield of California

1. Who were the parties involved in the case? (plaintiff/defendant/respondent/petitioner)

Jeanene Harlick the plaintiff and Blue Shield of California the defendant

2. What were the facts in the case?

For more than 20 years, Harlick, a 38-year-old female, suffered from anorexia nervosa, an eating disorder. She was covered by her employers health insurance plan through Blue Shield, and was treated for her disorder through this plan. Her doctor then advised her that she required residential treatment. Harlick and her doctors ultimately determined that none of the in-network facilities suggested by Blue Shield could provide effective treatment, so she registered at a residential treatment facility that specialized in eating disorders. While Blue Shield paid for the first 11 days of treatment, it then refused to pay for the rest of her treatment.

3. What was the Rule of Law in the case? (Rule of law the court applies to determine the rights of the parties)

Fill in the blank

4.Who won the case? Why?

Fill in the blank

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Using QuickBooks Online For Accounting

Authors: Glenn Owen

3rd Edition

0357391691, 9780357391693

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

What are the top 3 installed versions of UNIX / Linux ?

Answered: 1 week ago