Has the Court's reaffirmation of the core ofRoe v. Wadecreated a precedent that is "too late" to be disturbed? What weight should be attached to Justice Cardozo's view, as endorsed and explained by Justice O'Connor's opinion inPlanned Parenthood v. Casey, that the Court's work would suffer if "it eyed each issue afresh in every case that raised it"? Has the "undue burden" test provided a work- able standard that satisfies concerns about the Court's abortion jurisprudence?