Heidi Bauer suffered a brain injury in a motorcycle accident. Two years later, Jordan Moore, who was in default on a loan and was denied further credit by the bank, asked Bauer to take out a loan from the bank to invest in his business and the investment failed. When the loan matured, Bauer sued the bank claiming in part that Bauer lacked mental capacity to enter into the loan.

During the trial, Bauers attorney showed that Bauer was under court-appointed guardianship approximately one year before the loan transaction. Also, Bauer's testimony showed that she misunderstood the nature of the loan, believing that she was merely cosigning a loan for Moore and that Moore was responsible for paying it back. Finally, a medical expert testifying on Bauers behalf stated that Bauer was "very deficient in her cognitive abilities, her abilities to remember and to read, write and spell . . . she was very malleable, gullible, people could convince her of almost anything." The expert also said that she was "incompetent and . . . unable to make reasoned decisions" on the date she made the loan.

Heidi Bauer suffered a brain injury in a motorcycle accident. Two years later, Jordan Moore, who was in default on a loan and was denied further credit by the bank, asked Bauer to take out a loan from the bank to invest in his business and the investment failed. When the loan matured, Bauer sued the bank claiming in part that Bauer lacked mental capacity to enter into the loan. During the trial, Bauer's attorney showed that Bauer was under courtappointed guardianship approximately one year before the loan transaction. Also, Bauer's testimony showed that she misunderstood the nature of the loan, believing that she was merely cosigning a loan for Moore and that Moore was responsible for paying it back. Finally, a medical expert testifying on Bauer's behalf stated that Bauer was "very deficient in her cognitive abilities, her abilities to remember and to read, write and spell ... she was very malleable, gullible, people could convince her of almost anything." The expert also said that she was "incompetent and ... unable to make reasoned decisions" on the date she made the loan. Identifying the Facts and Issues is the element of a valid contract at issue here. may be affecting Bauer's capacity to contract. People who are adjudged mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; however most contracts are by the person or their guardian, meaning the contract exist. Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abilities indicate that she may not have understood the nature, purpose, or consequences of the contract. The court find Bauer mentally incompetent at the time she obtained the loan. If so, the loan be void. The bank void the loan because the option to void the contract is The bank's best argument that the contract with Bauer was valid is that Bauer was at the time she agreed to the loan. Total points: - -/5 Attempts left: 2 What If the Facts Were Different? What if, at the time of Bauer's signing of the loan with the bank, she had ongoing memory, showed good judgment, was not gullible, was reasonable in her goals and plans, and could manage her own affairs? Would a court have been likely to find the loan valid? The court find the loan valid because there is evidence that she may have been at the time of the contract. Heidi Bauer suffered a brain injury in a motorcycle accident. Two years later, Jordan Moore, who was in default on a loan and was denied further credit by the bank, asked Bauer to take out a loan from the bank to invest in his business and the investment failed. When the loan matured, Bauer sued the bank claiming in part that Bauer lacked mental capacity to enter into the loan. During the trial, Bauer's attorney showed that Bauer was under courtappointed guardianship approximately one year before the loan transaction. Also, Bauer's testimony showed that she misunderstood the nature of the loan, believing that she was merely cosigning a loan for Moore and that Moore was responsible for paying it back. Finally, a medical expert testifying on Bauer's behalf stated that Bauer was "very deficient in her cognitive abilities, her abilities to remember and to read, write and spell ... she was very malleable, gullible, people could convince her of almost anything." The expert also said that she was "incompetent and... unable to make reasoned decisions" on the date she made the loan. Identifying the Facts and Issues is the element of a valid contract at issue here. Consideration may be affecting Bauer's capacity to contract. Legality F ed mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; however most contracts are by the person or their guardian, meaning the contract exist. Identifying the Facts and Issues is the element of a valid contract at issue here. may be affecting Bauer's capacity to contract. ed mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; s are by the person or their guardian, meaning the contract exist. People who are adjudged mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; s are by the person or the contract exist. People who are adjudged mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; however most contracts are by the person or their guardian, meaning the c exist. Bauer's deficiency in her cogniure uomusus answer People who are adjudged mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; however most contracts are by the person or their guardian, meaning the contract exist. Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abili Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abilities indicate that she may not have understood consequences of the contract. The court ikely to find Bauer mentally incompetent at the time . If so, the loan be void. Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abilities indicate that she may not have understood the nature, purpose, or consequences of the contract. The court likely to find Bauer mentally incompetent at the tir an. If so, the loan be void. Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abilities indicate that she may not have understood the nature, purpose, or consequences of the contract. The court likely to find Bauer mentally incompetent at the time she obtained the loan. If so, the loan be void. The bank void the loan because the option to void The bank void the loan because the option to void the contrac The bank's best argument that the contrac is that Bauer was select an me she agreed to the loan. The bank void the loan because the option to void the contract is The bank's best argument that the contract wit at Bauer was select answer he agreed to the loan. What If the Fac The bank void the loan because the option to void the contract is The bank's best argument that the contract with Bauer was valid is that Bauer was at the time she agreed to the loan. e Different? What if the Facts Were Different? What if, at the time of Bauer's signing of the loan with the bank, she had ongoing memory, showed good judgment, was not gullible, was reasonable in her goals and plans, and could manage her own affairs? Would a court have been likely to find the loan valid? The court find the loan valid because there is evidence th at the time of the contrac What If the Facts Were Different? What if, at the time of Bauer's signing of the loan with the bank, she had ongoing memory, showed good judgment, was not gullible, was reasonable in her goals and plans, and could manage her own affairs? Would a court have been likely to find the loan valid? The court find the loan valid because there is evidence that she may have been at the time of the contract. lucid Heidi Bauer suffered a brain injury in a motorcycle accident. Two years later, Jordan Moore, who was in default on a loan and was denied further credit by the bank, asked Bauer to take out a loan from the bank to invest in his business and the investment failed. When the loan matured, Bauer sued the bank claiming in part that Bauer lacked mental capacity to enter into the loan. During the trial, Bauer's attorney showed that Bauer was under courtappointed guardianship approximately one year before the loan transaction. Also, Bauer's testimony showed that she misunderstood the nature of the loan, believing that she was merely cosigning a loan for Moore and that Moore was responsible for paying it back. Finally, a medical expert testifying on Bauer's behalf stated that Bauer was "very deficient in her cognitive abilities, her abilities to remember and to read, write and spell ... she was very malleable, gullible, people could convince her of almost anything." The expert also said that she was "incompetent and ... unable to make reasoned decisions" on the date she made the loan. Identifying the Facts and Issues is the element of a valid contract at issue here. may be affecting Bauer's capacity to contract. People who are adjudged mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; however most contracts are by the person or their guardian, meaning the contract exist. Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abilities indicate that she may not have understood the nature, purpose, or consequences of the contract. The court find Bauer mentally incompetent at the time she obtained the loan. If so, the loan be void. The bank void the loan because the option to void the contract is The bank's best argument that the contract with Bauer was valid is that Bauer was at the time she agreed to the loan. Total points: - -/5 Attempts left: 2 What If the Facts Were Different? What if, at the time of Bauer's signing of the loan with the bank, she had ongoing memory, showed good judgment, was not gullible, was reasonable in her goals and plans, and could manage her own affairs? Would a court have been likely to find the loan valid? The court find the loan valid because there is evidence that she may have been at the time of the contract. Heidi Bauer suffered a brain injury in a motorcycle accident. Two years later, Jordan Moore, who was in default on a loan and was denied further credit by the bank, asked Bauer to take out a loan from the bank to invest in his business and the investment failed. When the loan matured, Bauer sued the bank claiming in part that Bauer lacked mental capacity to enter into the loan. During the trial, Bauer's attorney showed that Bauer was under courtappointed guardianship approximately one year before the loan transaction. Also, Bauer's testimony showed that she misunderstood the nature of the loan, believing that she was merely cosigning a loan for Moore and that Moore was responsible for paying it back. Finally, a medical expert testifying on Bauer's behalf stated that Bauer was "very deficient in her cognitive abilities, her abilities to remember and to read, write and spell ... she was very malleable, gullible, people could convince her of almost anything." The expert also said that she was "incompetent and... unable to make reasoned decisions" on the date she made the loan. Identifying the Facts and Issues is the element of a valid contract at issue here. Consideration may be affecting Bauer's capacity to contract. Legality F ed mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; however most contracts are by the person or their guardian, meaning the contract exist. Identifying the Facts and Issues is the element of a valid contract at issue here. may be affecting Bauer's capacity to contract. ed mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; s are by the person or their guardian, meaning the contract exist. People who are adjudged mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; s are by the person or the contract exist. People who are adjudged mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; however most contracts are by the person or their guardian, meaning the c exist. Bauer's deficiency in her cogniure uomusus answer People who are adjudged mentally incompetent by the court enter into a valid contract for necessities; however most contracts are by the person or their guardian, meaning the contract exist. Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abili Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abilities indicate that she may not have understood consequences of the contract. The court ikely to find Bauer mentally incompetent at the time . If so, the loan be void. Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abilities indicate that she may not have understood the nature, purpose, or consequences of the contract. The court likely to find Bauer mentally incompetent at the tir an. If so, the loan be void. Bauer's deficiency in her cognitive abilities indicate that she may not have understood the nature, purpose, or consequences of the contract. The court likely to find Bauer mentally incompetent at the time she obtained the loan. If so, the loan be void. The bank void the loan because the option to void The bank void the loan because the option to void the contrac The bank's best argument that the contrac is that Bauer was select an me she agreed to the loan. The bank void the loan because the option to void the contract is The bank's best argument that the contract wit at Bauer was select answer he agreed to the loan. What If the Fac The bank void the loan because the option to void the contract is The bank's best argument that the contract with Bauer was valid is that Bauer was at the time she agreed to the loan. e Different? What if the Facts Were Different? What if, at the time of Bauer's signing of the loan with the bank, she had ongoing memory, showed good judgment, was not gullible, was reasonable in her goals and plans, and could manage her own affairs? Would a court have been likely to find the loan valid? The court find the loan valid because there is evidence th at the time of the contrac What If the Facts Were Different? What if, at the time of Bauer's signing of the loan with the bank, she had ongoing memory, showed good judgment, was not gullible, was reasonable in her goals and plans, and could manage her own affairs? Would a court have been likely to find the loan valid? The court find the loan valid because there is evidence that she may have been at the time of the contract. lucid