Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Hello I got this answer for the following questions. The issue is I think the compare part is incorrect. It's written that the M1 is

Hello I got this answer for the following questions. The issue is I think the compare part is incorrect. It's written that the M1 is better because it has a less cycle time. but I see it's not less .Can U help!
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
Question 2 [40 points) Two alternative machines are being compared. Machine Ma has an average effective process time of 2.2 hours with a standard deviation of 2.2 hour. Machine M2 has a shorter effective process time of 1.5 hours but a standard deviation of 3.8 hour. Do the following analysis to compare the two machines. A. [10 marks] For an arrival rate of 0.25 jobs per hour and coefficient of variation of 1, compare the two machines for cycle time and work in process units. Which machine is preferred? Explain your answer. B. [10 marks] Repeat part A if the arrival rate is increased by 20%. C. [10 marks] Repeat part A if the arrival rate is decreased by 20% D. [10 marks] Make smart comments on all the results above. Use the results of your calculations to make your comments (that is: do not make generic comments) eatin Ghe Infancia 0.15 3 3 1.00 -100 textos ACE Coffof takim win effective procesin tinte ha Standard de profie OHUtation Gulf of variation for alle V-100 0-015-055 wor33 1-re fechive for takie sking time of 2 cycle de formes Fecommended Machine 1 is clearly seen that even when the penge elfective prostang forever notices Machine 2 l performing bele home of histe utilisation and better ajele wakusty Awwal kat robe i inosed by loco 06 3.35 5883 H 0.25 Doctus 1 fai Mac 020 1 tadine 2-30 2.2 5.45 1. 63 Calf /varatum.fo e Alime sflector fotod Adderletak UN los cliticotina chandeliefsteg 1.2.100 y-cola 0: 00H ref.frecer Wing Infositing time to wo1) 6192 (2) cych time the Gresa De is clearly teen that exto che le Avenge effectie powering time I was the machine, i vachicos ligofiening ulteriore of bisher biri And In de bioder 4-100 con mended Machine 2.2 6199 0899 10 9100 Veecon 2 06 601 0.05.SOHB el proceding Here o Italting tionele cookies) cycle time the Orc commended Machine It is cleanly seen that exto che C Average effect pocesting te latest machine, in machine a 'pofising built theme of highelicati. ond deneydet du low vanability anal Boule de dead by 10 mons 0:25 -0.20) 8.26X 0.2 to CNC Machine Machine particulos Aswathirreth land for i All Heche prodeing hire 1 3 tid dev of parengtas 1.00 5700 ds 1727 3.921 2-3154 5.674 (0 Utilisate 0-2012.01. 010160 10 bed of. Werking 1.300 15115255 -20" totum U-Orovy wo 1950-Y-04-0434 - el. preetingrime 10) Waiting tincelesne este time tha latci E GAMEnded Mega 2. cauty Sets that exto when the. Average electie Parce ding 10 Machine Machine is perfening bette infome of higher wilisation and dea cele to variability (cocok som all the results we lound that Mackie has good can be seen cle cats that even when the avere effective procching time it Nat Mochine), Machine -9 i posfoming es in term of higher utilitation and trade time due to to tasability pls help me cut by just waiting the ancak 3.x Thank you. ** time due to

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions