Hello kindly help me elaborate and discuss about this issue:

1. G.R. 213948 Knights of Rizal: Petitioner Torre De Manila Condominium

State the Case, Issues and Court Ruling. Thank you.

2. Research 3 cases on due process of law related to tourism and hospitality.

State the facts, issues and court ruling.

Follow the standard format.

EXAMPLE:

Illustrative Case: Yrasuegi vs. Phil. Airlines, GR No. 168081, October 17, 2008 Facts: Mr. X is an international flight steward of Philippine airlines, Inc. (PAL). He stands five feet and eight inches (5'8") with a large body frame. Under the Cabin and Crew Administration Manual of PAL, the weight to be maintained by all employees shall be 166 pounds. During the time he was hired, Mr. X met weight requirement. However, after a couple of years, Mr. X weighed 205 pounds which is beyond the 166 ponds limit. Mr. X was given a chance to lose weight, but instead of losing his weight he gained more. Thereafter, Mr. X was terminated for violating the company rules. He filed an illegal dismissal case against PAL. One of the arguments of Mr. X is that the company rules are discriminatory, it is not fair. In other words. Mr. X is invoking section 1 of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution.Illustrative Case: Yrasuegi vs. Phil. Airlines, GR No. 168081, October 17, 2008 Issue: Is Mr. X correct in invoking section 1 of the Bill of Rights against Philippine Airlines Inc. which is a private entity? Ruling: Mr. X is not correct in invoking the bill of rights. not meant to be invoked against acts of private The Bill of Rights is individuals (like PAL, a private entity). The equal protection erects no shield against private conduct, however discriminatory or wrongful. Private actions, no matter how egregious, cannot violate the equal protection guarantee."