Hello tutors, I need help with my THE LAW ON OBLIGATION AND CONTRACTS assignment so I would really appreciate it if you can help me.

CASE:

In need of cash, Glen went to Mario's pawnshop to pawn a bracelet that was given to him by his father. Upon maturity, Glen went to the pawnshop to redeem the bracelet. However, Mario told him that a group of men armed with powerful guns went to the pawnshop, subdued the highly trained guards, and pressured the manager at gunpoint to open the vault, and took the jewelry. Mario said that what happened was a fortuitous event, thus, he is no longer obliged to return the bracelet or its value. Is he correct? Reason/s.

This format is highly recommended for the case above

Categorical answer:

Legal basis:

Application on the given set of facts:

Brief conclusion:

This is a case from the Philippines, so you need the articles or provision from the country stated, kindly go here for the reference of the said provisions: (Article 1156 to Article 1206)

https://www.chanrobles.com/civilcodeofthephilippinesbook4.htm