Question
Help me answer this question and go step by step for the calculations: Question1: McAllister et al. (2012) compared college football and hockey players with
Help me answer this question and go step by step for the calculations:
Question1: McAllister et al. (2012) compared college football and hockey players with college athletes playing non-contact sports to determine if exposure to head impacts over the course of a season had an effect on cognitive performance. In the study, tests of new learning performance were significantly worse for athletes playing contact sports than for those playing non-contact sports. The following table presents data similar to the results obtained in the study.
Athltes (Sport sans contact) | Athltes (Sport avec contact) |
11 | 8 |
9 | 5 |
8 | 10 |
10 | 4 |
14 | 8 |
8 | 7 |
7 | 11 |
13 | 3 |
a) Choose your hypothesis test, do your calculations and answer this question in detail (step by step): Are the results of athletes playing contact sports significantly lower than those of athletes playing non-contact sports? (Use a one-tailed test with an alpha of 0.05.)
b) Calculate the value of r2 (the percentage of variance explained by these data) and give its interpretation in detail (step by step).
c) Suppose that your samples are not equal, and that in the list corresponding to athletes with contact, you are missing 2 values. What approach can you use to work around this problem and go in detail (step by step)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started