.Help me solve the following questions.

following attachments with clear explanations.

In December 2015, representatives from 195 nations gathered in Paris and signed an international agreement to address climate change, which many observers called a breakthrough for several reasons. First, the fact that a deal was struck at all was a major accomplishment, given the failure of previous climate change talks. Second, unlike previous climate change accords that focused exclusively on developed countries, this pact committed both developed and developing countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the voluntary targets established by nations in the Paris climate deal fall considerably short of what many scientists deem necessary to achieve the stated goal of the negotiations: limiting the global temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius. Furthermore, since the established targets are voluntary, they may be lowered or abandoned due to political resistance, short-term economic crises, or simply social fatigue or disinterest.

As philosophy professor Stephen Gardiner aptly explains, the challenge of climate change presents the world with several fundamental ethical dilemmas. It is simultaneously a profoundly global, intergenerational, and philosophical problem. First, from a global perspective, climate change presents the world with a collective action problem: all countries have a collective interest in controlling global carbon emissions. But each individual country also has incentives to over-consume (in this case, to emit as much carbon as necessary) in response to societal demands for economic growth and prosperity.

Second, as an intergenerational problem, the consequences of actions taken by the current generation will have the greatest impact on future generations yet to be born. Thus, the current generation must forego benefits today in order to protect against possibly catastrophic costs in the future. This tradeoff is particularly difficult for developing countries. They must somehow achieve economic growth in the present to break out of a persistent cycle of poverty, while limiting the amount of greenhouse gasses emitted into the atmosphere to protect future generations. The fact that prosperous, developed countries (such as the U.S. and those in Europe) arguably created the current climate problems during their previous industrial economic development in the 19th and 20th centuries complicates the tradeoffs between economic development and preventing further climate change.

Finally, the global and intergenerational nature of climate change points to the underlying philosophical dimensions of the problem. While it is intuitive that the current generation has some ethical responsibility to leave an inhabitable world to future generations, the extent of this obligation is less clear. The same goes for individual countries who have pledged to reduce carbon emissions to help protect environmental health, but then face real economic and social costs when executing those pledges. Developing nations faced with these costs may encounter further challenges as the impact of climate change will most likely fall disproportionally on the poor, thus also raising issues of fairness and inequality.

Discussion Questions:

5. Considering that the negative impacts of climate change will likely fall disproportionally on the poor, yet developing countries must often increase consumption and emissions to achieve greater economic growth, do you think developing nations should be exempt from actions to control climate change? Why or why not?

6. The climate change agreement approved in Paris is based on voluntary goals and pledges by participating countries. Would it be ethically permissible to impose carbon emission goals on countries and individuals and enforce them with penalties? Explain your reasoning.

7.Should individuals, organizations, cities and states stay activity involved in climate change prevention even though President Trump pulled out of the Paris agreement?

PART B Emissions reduction treaties between nations have been proposed as a key method with which to tackle climate change and its negative impacts. One such treaty is the Paris Agreement. Adopted by 197 nations in 2015, the deal aims to substantially reduce carbon emissions and to limit the global temperature increase in this century to 2 degrees Celsius. A summary of the Paris Agreement can be found here. The Paris Agreement includes commitments from all nations to reduce their emissions and work together to adapt to the impacts of climate change and calls on a strengthening of commitments over time. The agreement provides a pathway for developed nations to assist developing nations in their climate mitigation and adaptation efforts. Nations can set their own 'nationally determined contributions' towards emissions reductions that reflect their capabilities, level of economic development, and contribution to emissions over time. Question 4 Binding treaties to abate emissions between groups of nations are often difficult to achieve. Explain why this is the case. You must cite at least one reputable source from your own research. Include the full reference at the end of your answer, which will not count towards the word limit. Use a standard referencing system (e.g. Harvard style). [3 marks] [max words: 200] MACQUARIE MACQUARIE BUSINESS SCHOOL University Department of Economics Question 5 Discuss three reasons why the Paris Agreement treats developing nations differently from developed nations. You must cite at least one reputable source from your own research. Include the full reference at the end of your answer, which will not count towards the word limit. Use a standard referencing system (e.g. Harvard style). [3 marks] [max words: 200] Question 6 Evaluate the decision to distinguish between developed and developing nations in the Paris Agreement from the perspective of substantive and procedural judgements of fairness. Be sure to define both judgements of fairness in your answer. [5 marks] [max words: 500] Question 7 The Paris Agreement is based on voluntary carbon emissions reduction pledges made by participating nations. Using either a consequentialist or a deontological framework, discuss if it would be ethically acceptable to legally impose these emission reduction pledges and enforce these goals with penalties? Explain your reasoning. Be sure to define your chosen ethical framework in your answer. [5 marks] [max words: 500]