help pls

The accounting team at Novak is considering its options for reporting performance at the end of this year. Novak specializes in mylar balloons, which it sells for $0.77 each. Novak has used only absorption costing within its standard costing system, but management team members feel uneasy about Novak's most recent year's modest income (despite higher-volume sales than the previous year). They wonder if there is a different way to put the financial statements together that would provide a more consistent-and perhaps conservative-presentation of performance. Some people on the accounting team have experience with variable costing. so they suggest putting together a side by- side comparison of both costing systems for the past two years in order to compare the results. Following are the budgeted costs and budgeted production that were in place for both years, along with actual volume information for each year. There were no price or efficiency variances for either year. Company policy is to write off any foxed-MOH volume variance directly to COGS in the year incurred. Present Novak's income statement for both years under variable costing. (L.ist varlable expenses before fixed expenses)