Here is the question from my screen shot.

This is all the question.

Your university has a Strategic Planning Committee composed of the following people: -The Dean of the College -The Vice President for Finance -The Vice President for Development (fundraising) -A representative from the Board of Trustees -The Director of Admissions -The Director of Planning and Institutional Research -Three elected faculty members -Two students selected by the Student -Government Association -An alumni representative Some committee members (administrators) are appointed to the committee permanently. Others (faculty members and students) are appointed to one-year terms. The committee's charge is to make recommendations to the president about new goals and objectives for the Strategic Plan. To do this, the committee has been asked first to review the University's Mission Statement, as well as the Institutional Goals for Graduates and how they relate to the Mission. Then the committee is asked to evaluate progress made toward these goals since establishment of the previous Strategic Plan. The committee then must facilitate and coordinate the annual update of the Plan before finally making their recommendations.

Questions for Analysis

1. Consider the membership of this group. What source(s) of power can you identify for each member based on the member's titleor affiliation?

2. Can you predict which group members are mostlikely to enact certain group roles? Which members and which roles? Why do you think this?

3. Rank committee members by their status. What is the basis for your rankings?

4. This is a committee that has relatively permanent members (dean, vice presidents, and directors), as well as members who are more short-term (representatives from trustees, alumni, students, faculty).

How will this affect the establishment of group norms from year to year?