hey business law tutors please answer this

According to this old notion, each person has a dominant half, resulting in only two types of people in the world: creative people who can't do math, and technical people who can't make art. First of all, this old notion is simply wrong. The brain is very complex. Creativity and technical ability, along with hundreds of other traits, emerge from a complicated interaction of neurons that involves the whole brain. A study performed byHarnam Singhfound that "Notably, the MG [Mathematically Gifted] showed no reliable left-right differences when processing global or local information on unilateral trials." This study found that mathematical ability is more a function of how well the two halves of the brain communicate and work together and not a function of which half dominates. Furthermore, there are creative technical people and non-creative, non-technical people, so the two traits are not mutually exclusive. Also, there are billions of different kinds of people in the world, each with his or her unique blend of traits.

Even if half of the brain was solely creative and the other half was solely technical, real science requires both, so scientists would have both halves equally dominant. It is true that science uses mathematics and technical recipes. But those are just the language of science. The meat of science is highly creative: forming hypothesis, building new tools, crafting new models, designing new experiments, interpreting results, and making conceptual connections. The only part of science that is not very creative (running the experiment once everything is designed and setup) is not even done typically by scientists these days. The actual running of an experiment is typically carried out by machines or lab technicians. Forming a hypothesis involves creating an idea about how the world works that may or may not be true. There are no technical recipes for making original hypotheses. When students read biographies of great scientists, they often puzzle, "how did he come up with this idea in the first place?" Often, the only answer is, "He was creative." Some of the best scientists have the craziest ideas for a new model or a new experiment. Most of these ideas don't work out, but some do. Building new scientific tools; such as microscopes, telescopes, particle accelerators, and particle detectors; is an important form of science. People who useestablishedscience to build ever better tools are engineers. People who usenewscience in order to build better tools are scientists. There is not one right way to build a better tool

questions

1.from the initial stage of the preparation of the budget, include the role played by the management in the costaccounting classification

2.for the dynamics of the balanced score card, what is the furthest end limitation that talks about theown requirements?

3.commemorate on the necessity to improvise the communication scheme networks for the implementation of organizational strategy of management

4.what are the end products of the process of the implementation of the balanced scored card for financial ,measures?

5.propse the brand analysisfor the introduction the management of the human resources for the FPI

6. generate theratios that guide the financial gearing for thepayments to equity.

7.how can the rationality of the receivables be treated in the gearing of management ?

8.discuss the liquidity measures for the working capital ratios management

9.describehow to indicate the factors that render the application of thebenefits of target-setting at par

10.on the basis of what to measure; how can such be regarded as a challengeto thebenefits of performance measurement?