Hi i am looking for the following ans of the case study, it is the ontario engineering law

Information you will find in the case Information you will find in the law Facts in the above case that capture Professional misconduct Legal the engineer misconduct (2 point each) (Note: use the wording of the justification legislation/regulation) (3 points each) (section, paragraph, sub- paragraph + name) (3 points each) 1. 2. 3.CASE No. 4 Normand decides to convert its cellar into a living accommodation by increasing its height. Normand engages engineering rm ABC to design the structural works, specically undeminning the outer walls and lowering the oor to create more height. Engineering rm ABC is not engaged to supervise and inspect the works. Later, Normand hires contractor XYZ to install the underpinning and perform the excavation based on ABC's design. During the project, contractor XYZ engages engineering rm ABC to inspect solely the construction of one of the pins. During the site visit, the engineer for ABC notes the design drawings are not being followed: specically, there was no reinforcement. Furthermore, the engineer informs contractor XYZ that the pin needs to be replaced and explains the importance of following the design ch'awings. Engineering rm ABC does not inform Normand that contractor XYZ was not following the design drawings, as at the time, there was no imminent danger or reason to believe contractor XYZ would not follow the drawings after receiving the engineer's advice. Contractor XYZ continues its work without following the drawings, ignoring the advice of the engineer. Later, Normand observes serious cracking on the structure and evacuates the building; subsequently, part of the building collapses. Thereupon, Normand brings proceedings against engineering rm ABC and contractor XYZ. However, contractor XYZ is insolvent and plays no part in the proceedings. Identify three (3) professional misconduct of engineering rm ABC. For each, provide a legal justication by indicating the applicable section (paragraph and sub-paragraph if applicable) and name (not the reference} of the legislation or regulation. Also explain in the contend of this case, which facts of the case is related to the misconduct. (24 points)