Hi,

I am looking to critique the discussion section of article Sim et al., (2015) - Effectiveness of an early intervention programme for pre-school children at risk of dyslexia in Singapore.

Please advise if you agree, if I am missing something in critiquing the discussion section:

1. the study provides evidence that the intervention was overall effective

2. sufficient analysis is provided to answer the research questions and that results were statistically and clinically significant.

3. Not sufficient linkage was provided that tied the discussion back to literature provided in the study

4. discussion supported that the findings supported the hypothesis

5. discussion did not discuss strengths, limitations, biasses but did present ideas for future research.