Hi! I have the assignment that I have to respond to my peer.

1. Respond to their thoughts and add your own perspectives. Agree or disagree (respectfully) and post response here.

2. Please read my work first and then read the peer's

3..Please respond my peer about 2-3 paragraph

Here is my work:

Every project has its own unique combination of stakeholders, and the proportion of each type of stakeholder involved in a project might change based on the scope of the endeavor and the outcomes that are expected from it. In general, the following is a breakdown of the optimum percentage of each sort of stakeholder that should be present in a project: The proportion of drivers should be roughly fifty percent, the proportion of supporters should be roughly thirty percent, and the proportion of observers should be roughly twenty percent. This split is good because it ensures that the project has sufficient personnel actively working towards obtaining the target outcome and sufficient individuals actively monitoring the progress of the project to ensure that it remains on track.

When planning a project, it is essential to think about how each different kind of stakeholder will be involved in each stage of the process. During the conceive stage of the project, Drivers should have a significant hand in deciding what the project's goals and objectives will be, as well as the resources that will be required and the schedule that will be followed. Both Supporters and Observers need to be involved in the process of assisting to detect potential hazards and of providing expert advise and criticism, respectively. During the Define stage of the project, Supporters should be involved in helping to define resources and tactics, while Drivers should be involved in setting the project budget and timeframe. During this stage as well, observers should be involved in providing support and advise in order to be effective.

Drivers should be involved in the process of generating a project plan and allocating responsibilities to team members during the Start stage of the project, while Supporters should be involved in the process of assisting to review the project plan and providing comments on the plan. The project team ought to invite observers to participate in the process of receiving advice and direction from them. Drivers should be involved in monitoring the progress of the project and making sure that tasks are done on schedule during the Perform stage, while Supporters should be involved in providing feedback and help to any team members who are having difficulty.

Throughout the entirety of this period, observers ought to be actively involved in offering advise and direction. Finally, during the close stage of the project, Drivers should be active in collecting project deliverables and analyzing the effectiveness of the project, while Supporters should be involved in collecting project deliverables and assisting to organize any post-project activities. The project team should encourage observers to participate in the process of providing feedback and analysis in order to facilitate the necessary modifications.

To summarize, there is no universally applicable method for calculating the appropriate proportion of each category of project stakeholder to include in a given endeavor. To provide a decent beginning point, however, the basic breakdown of 50% Drivers, 30% Supporters, and 20% Observers can be used. In order for the project to be successful, it is essential to take into consideration the part that each category of stakeholder needs to play at each stage of the process.

Here is my peer's work:

"The book discusses how drivers, supporters, and observers are going to be present in any project. (The book neglects the Oxford comma, but alas, I must use it in my own submissions!) Drivers it notes are individuals who have a say in the final features of any project, while supporters are those who will perform a service or provide resources for a project. Observers are, as expected, those who observe the project and its results and then presumedly give feedback and responses to that. If planned correctly, I would argue that drivers should be a massive part of projects, possible 50%, while supports and observers should be 25% each. My reasoning for this is simple, in most projects the critical stakeholders should be the ones that are on the receiving end of any impacts of the project. For example, if you are changing an invoicing system (a project close to my system), your managing consultants building those invoices should be most important stakeholders since it is their productivity/happiness/efficiency that you are trying to increase more than anything. Theyshould be your drivers, the ones who have a large impact on the end result. Oftentimes, folks will focus on thewrongstakeholders, which lead to products that don't actually help the most important end user and instead lead to a wasteful product that isn't well accepted. Of course, the observers and supporters are important, because without that the project cannot be finished. The supporters are the ones lending the resources to actually get in done, in the example given they would be essential for the success of the project. But again, it is for the drivers that the project matters and is the reason you are doing most of it in the first place. "

NT