Hi, I need a help with the questions #7,#8, #9,#10. All the screenshots are attached. Thank you!

4. "Assume Coca Cola and Pepsi agree to charge 90 per can of soda. Because this agreement does not hurt small soft drink producers, it is legal in the United States.\" Is this analysis correct? Why or why not? Answer the following mm questions. Jane Don't Advertise advertise Advertise J: $6,000 J: $3,000 Don't J: $12,000 J: $10,000 advertise B:$15,000 5. The payoff matrix of economic prots above displays the possible outcomes for El Bob and Jane who are involved in game of whether or not to advertise. If Jane advertises, Bob's profit will be _ if he advertises. $10,000 $20,000 $5,000 $15,000 9951? E00 2023 {Online} 6. Using the payoff matrix above, which player(s) will always advertise regardless of what the other player does? Bob only. Jane only. Both Bob and Jane. 992:7! Neither Bob nor Jane. 7. Using the payoff matrix above, in the Nash equilibrium Jane's prot is _ and Bob's profit is _. $6,000; $10,000 $3,000; $20,000 $12,000; $5,000 $10,000; $15,000 8. The Sherman Act, which deregulated banking, was enacted in 1890. 5295:! which deregulated banking, was enacted in 1980. W: was enacted in 1890. W was enacted in 1980. 529?! 9. The Sherman Act makes it illegal to increase market share. merge rms in the same industry. mm monopolize an industry. price below competitors. 905:9: ECO 2023 (Online) 10. If Mcdonald's, Wendy's, and Burger King agree with each other not to sell hamburgers for less than $2.95 apiece, all three could be found guilty a. of an interlocking directorship under the Clayton Act. b of price fixing under the Sherman Act. C. of a deceptive business practice under the Clayton Act. d. All of the above