hi, i need to identify the rights that the borrower legally has against the seller and what the judge would most likely rule in court. thanks

Fact Patterns: Please choose ONE (1) of the following fact pattern options for your project. Each of these fact patterns has at least three legal issues. Please assume the facts are correct, however, if the rule and its application requires further details or facts not stated, you can note that in your analysis. Option 1 (Contracts, Torts) Buyer, who was in the market for a car, heard that Seller wanted to sell his car for $5,000. On June 1, Buyer visited Seller and saw the car. Buyer asked Seller about the car's condition. In response, Seller said, "The car is in tip-top shape the brakes and clutch were replaced in the last six months. It's in beautiful shape for a vehicle of this age. Good for another 100,000 miles easy." Seller agreed to sell the car to Buyer for $5,000. They both signed the following document: "Seller agrees to sell, and Buyer agrees to buy, Seller's car for the price of $5,000. Buyer will pick up the car at Seller's home on June 2 and pay Seller $5,000 in cash at that time." On June 2, Buyer came to Seller's home. Before handing the payment to Seller,Buyer said, "I'd like my mechanic to look at the car to make sure that it is as you represented it." Seller responded, "Don't waste money on a mechanic. The car is exactly as I described it." Even though Buyer, while at Seller's home, had no way to tell if the brakes and clutch were as represented, Buyer thought that it would be a waste of time and money to visit a mechanic and thus decided to proceed with the transaction. Accordingly, after briefly inspecting the car, Buyer gave Seller $5,000 in cash. Seller handed Buyer the keys to the car, and Buyer left with the car. On June 10, the car broke down and Buyer had it towed to a mechanic's shop. After looking at the car, the mechanic accurately told Buyer that the clutch had failed because it was old and needed to be replaced. The mechanic also warned Buyer that the brakes were unsafe and that the engine needed a complete overhaul or it would not last another 10,000 miles. The mechanic told Buyer that if the car had been as represented by Seller, it would have had a market value of $5,000, but in its current condition the car was worth only about $500 its value as salvage for parts. On June 11, Buyer hand-delivered a letter to Seller. The letter informed Seller that Buyer was revoking his acceptance of the car and that Seller could recover his car at the mechanic's shop. What rights, if any, does Buyer have against Seller? Explain. (200 Points)