Hi I urgently need answers for these 3 questions. Thank you

1.

2.

3.

Under the Common Law of environmental nuisance a defendant may successfully claim that the nuisance is a benefit to the public thereby eliminating liability O a defendant may use the defence that it used all necessary care and skill to prevent the nuisance from occurring. O a defendant may successfully use the defence that it existed with its offending activity before the plaintiff came to the nuisance O a defendant may not argue that its actions do not constitute nuisance because other entities independent of it are also engaged in the same activity all of the above none of the above Kirk runs Trek Inc. He has been doing business in Canada for several years. Trek Inc. manufactures Flux Capacitors for the growing clean energy trend. He wishes to expand into the European market. He is concerned about the expansion and is unsure of the proper method of establishing the company abroad. He is thinking of contacting a European company to assist in this expansion. How may an ongoing relationship for the distribution of goods be structured? O a. Foreign Distribution Agreement O b. Creation of a Foreign branch plant or sales office O c. Joint Venture agreement O d. Licensing of Patents e. Both A and B Of. All of the above "Due Diligence in the environmental law context O is one of the defences which a party charged with an environmental offence may use would be satisfactorily proven where company officials have issued directives to management to establish careful storage procedures for potential contaminants requires ongoing monitoring by the company's directors to ensure that management is complying with the directives set out is part of the environmental assessment process to determine whether a certain activity has the potential for causing environmental damage O All of the above None of the above