Hi, please help me analyze this video following these questions:

• If you were the attorney representing the vehicle owner, what legal basis would you use for your claim: intentional tort, negligence, or strict liability? Support your answer with law and define all legal terms.
• To prevail most easily, which tort basis should you use? Why?
• Assume you are the attorney representing the vehicle owner or building owner (to be called Vehicle and Building), argue your case using fact and law to prove why your client should prevail in this case. If you argue your claim based on negligence, you must prove duty, breach, cause in fact, proximate cause, and damages, and/or res ipsa loquitur. If you argue our case based on intentional tort you must name the intentional tort, define it, and explain why this plaintiff was wronged by this defendant, If you argue based on struct liability, ou must show how this is an abnormally dangerous activity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veuvwsqVwyQ&t=8s

Note: Brief a Case in IRAC