Hi there,

My first question is what is the structure and outline of what my Panel Discussion should look like and what sources to include for my assignment. Please Help. The Assignment is 20% of my grade. Thank you in advance.

Quality and depth of the discussion, including the ability to engage the entire class within the allotted time frame. Individual and group participation in the panel. Overall presentation and professionalism. FINAL ESSAY ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Instructions: As a Lawyer in the Attorney-General''s Department, you''ve honed your skills in analysing international human rights jurisprudence. Now, it's time to apply that knowledge to a real-world scenario. Drawing on your insights from the ECHR case analysis and podcast panel discussions, you will craft a persuasive essay advocating for change on a human rights issue relevant to Australia. Your Task 1. Choose a Human Rights Issue: Select a pressing human rights issue currently being debated in Australia that resonates with you. This could be an issue explored in your ECHR memo, discussed in your podcast panel, or another topic of personal interest. 2. Identify a Specific Goal: Clearly define the specific change you wish to advocate for. This could be a policy reform, a legal change, increased public awareness, or a shift in societal attitudes. 3. Research and Analyze: Thoroughly research the chosen human rights issue, drawing on credible sources such as: Relevant international human rights treaties and instruments (e.g., ICCPR, other UN treaties) Australian legislation, case law, and government reports Academic articles and books Reports and publications from reputable human rights organisations (e.g., Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch) Analyse the current situation in Australia regarding this issue. Identify the root causes of the problem, the individuals or groups most affected, and any existing initiatives or obstacles to change. 4. Craft a Persuasive Argument: Develop a clear and compelling thesis statement that articulates your position and the specific change you are advocating for Structure your essay logically, presenting your arguments in a coherent and persuasive manner. Support your claims with evidence from your research, using specific examples and data to strengthen your case. Consider counterarguments and address them effectively, demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the complexities of the issue. 5. Propose Concrete Solutions: Qutline specific, actionable steps that could be taken to achieve your desired change. Consider the feasibility and potential impact of your proposed solutions. Address potential obstacles or challenges to implementation and offer strategies to overcome them. Assessment Criteria Your essay will be assessed on: Depth of Research: Demonstrated understanding of the chosen human rights issue, supported by credible sources and evidence. Strength of Argument: Clear and persuasive presentation of arguments, with effective use of evidence and counterargument analysis. Feasibility of Solutions: Practicality and potential impact of the proposed solutions, addressing potential obstacles. Clarity and Conciseness: Clear and concise writing, adhering to the 2000-word limit. - Originality: Evidence of critical thinking, independent analysis, and original insights. \fPANEL DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Instructions: Overview In groups of 4-5, you will lead a 20-30 minute in-class panel discussion on a human rights-focused podcast episode of your choice (podcast must be a minimum of 20 minutes in duration). Your goal is to spark a lively conversation that explores the podcast''s key themes and their connection to current human rights issues relevant to the weekly class topic. This is not a scripted presentation, but a chance to actively engage your classmates and delve deeper into the complexities of human rights. Instructions 1. Podcast Selection: As a group, choose a podcast episode that is relevant to human rights and directly relates to the topic covered in class the week of your presentation. A curated list will be provided on vVUWS, but you are welcome to explore other options if they meet the criteria. 2. Approval: Submit your chosen podcast to the subject coordinator for approval no later than one week before your scheduled presentation date. 3. Preparation (Individual): Each group member listens to the podcast episode individually. Prepare thoughtful questions and comments about: Key themes or arguments presented in the podcast. Connections to current human rights events or debates, specifically those related to the weekly class topic. Your personal reactions, opinions, or questions raised by the podcast. Consider different perspectives on the issues discussed. Identify potential points of disagreement or controversy that could spark debate. 4. Group Discussion (Pre-Panel): Share your individual insights, questions, and perspectives with your group. - Collectively decide which themes you want to focus on in your panel Assign roles: moderator, panellists. Prepare a brief outline of the discussion points to help guide the conversation and ensure it stays within the 20-30 minute timeframe. 5. Panel Discussion (In-Class): The moderator will introduce the podcast and panellists. Panellists will initiate the discussion by sharing their insights and questions. The moderator will facilitate the conversation, ensuring everyone participates, encouraging deeper exploration of the issues, and keeping the discussion on track and within the time limit. The panel will actively engage the rest of the class, inviting them to participate in the discussion with guestions, comments, and their own perspectives. The panel will conclude with a summary of key takeaways and reflections. Tips for Success Engage the Audience: Ask open-ended questions, seek diverse viewpoints, and create a welcoming environment for everyone to participate. Be Spontaneous: Allow for organic discussion and don't be afraid to deviate from your prepared notes. - Embrace Disagreement: Respectful debate and differing opinions are welcome! Connect to Class Topic: Ensure your discussion clearly links back to the human rights concepts and issues covered in class that week. Manage Time: Be mindful of the 20-30 minute time limit and aim for a balanced discussion that covers the main points effectively. Assessment Criteria Your group will be assessed on: Depth of understanding of the podcast's key themes and arguments. Ability to connect the podcast's content to the specific class topic, human rights law and broader human rights issues. Quality and depth of the discussion, including the ability to engage the entire class within the allotted time frame. Individual and group participation in the panel. Overall presentation and professionalism. FINAL ESSAY ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Instructions