Home Insert Page Layout References 5) Best Movers Inc. operates a moving company and was hired by Mrs. Mursal to move her furnishings into an apartment in downtown Regina. While moving the furniture into the suite, John Best, the owner and operator of Best Movers Inc, noticed that Mrs. Mursal's sofa and chair were very worn and he told her that he could sell her a used couch and chair that he had received as payment from another customer for $225. Mrs. Mursal indicated she would need to see the furniture and ensure it was "comfortable" before agreeing to the sale. When she attended the warehouse, she found both pieces comfortable and paid Best Movers Inc., who delivered the furniture the next day. One week later, Mrs. Mursal invited her 12-year-old granddaughter over for a visit. The granddaughter slept on the sofa and, within a few days of arriving, developed hive-like welts across her back and on her arms. After it was determined that the welts were bed bug bites, Mrs. Mursal hired a fumigator who fumigated the sofa and chair and she has not had any problems since. She tried to return the furniture to Best Movers Inc., however, Mr. Best maintains that the furniture was sold "as is." Does the Sale of Goods Act apply and, if so, what implied conditions or warranties might apply in this case? What arguments might Best Movers Inc. advance in this case 6) Ace Manufacturing Ltd agreed to manufacture and sell 5000 chairs to a convention centre. The contract contained detailed specifications for the chairs, and provided that the purchase price of $200 000 would be paid in two equal installments: one-half when the contract was signed and one-half when the convention centre was notified that the chairs were ready to be picked up. The contract said nothing about when ownership of the chairs would transfer to the buyer. The convention centre paid the first installment when the contract was signed. The chairs were manufactured by Ace and were in Ace's warehouse when a serious fire destroyed the warehouse and all the chairs. Ace had not yet notified the convention centre that the chairs were ready for pick-up, because the person who ordinarily makes such phone calls had been away from work due to an illness. Ace has demanded payment in full for the chairs from the convention centre. The convention centre has refused to pay the balance and has asked for a refund of the first installment it paid. Has title to the chairs passed from Ace to the convention centre? Does the convention centre have to pay the balance of the purchase price? Can the convention centre obtain a refund for the amount it has already paid