How can I answer the following questions concerning Canadian law please?

Question 3 [1 point} Jennifer Chang owns a 50 acre rural property which has been designated as critical habitat for an endangered bird species [the Eastern Bobolink) under both federal (SARA} and provincial law (ESAj. As a result, Jennifer cannot develop the land for a equestrian centre, which was her intention. Jennifer seeks advise as to whether she is entitled to compensation for the $055 of use {and value) of her land. Which statement represents the best legal advise? (W, Under the Canadian Constitution the government cannot deprive landowners of \\_./' their property without compensation. ("'x, Jennifer should sue both levels of government in nuisance, as their actions have .\\ ,- caused an unreasonable interference With the use and enjoyment of her land. ("3 Under the Convention on Biological Diversity, governments are prevented from \\._/ prowding compensation to landowners. K\". The governments have discretion to award compensation in such circumstances, -\\'_'/ u a u but are not required by law to provide compensation. Question 4 [1 point} In his paper "Should Trees have Standing?" Christopher Stone makes the following argument: ("3 Natural objects, because they are inanimate, cannot initiate actions or benefit \\._/ from judicial relief and can therefore never be considered to have legal rights. (:3. It is both possible and morally desirable to confer legal rights on natural objects. (W, Because natural objects do not have rights themselves humans are justified in \\_./' their exploitation of natural resources. Question 5 [1 pointi Which of the following are key differences between the Species at Risk Act (SARA) and the Ontario Endangered Species Act (ESA): i} Under the ESA, a species that is found to be endangered by the expert body (COSSARO) is automatically listed, whereas as under SARA, a species that is found to be endangered by the expert body {COSEWIC} is subject to review by cabinet prior to being sted. ii} Due to constitutional constraints, SARA only protects migratory birds and aquatic species. iii) Onfy SARA recognizes that species have intrinsic value. iv} ESA prohibits habitat destruction, whereas SARA uses recovery plans to protect critical habitat. C]: i} and iv) Q i}, ii), and iii) C} ii) oniy if} all of the a bove