How can I answer the following questions please?

Question 5 (1 point) KW Properties Inc. has sued Gotham Fuel Limited for negligence in relation to the damages from a fuel spill. Gotham has admitted liability and has indicated that it is willing to pay $250,000 in damages, an amount equal to the clean-up of the lands to a level that would permit the current uses to continue. KW has indicated that it is entitled to $350,000 in damages, an amount equal to the clean-up of the lands to a pristine level, and it is also entitled to further damages of$50,000.00 that represent the lost value of the lands owing to the stigma that attaches to lands that are contaminated, even if they are remediated. What damages is a court likely to award in the circumstances? '1: $400,000.00 for clean-up to pristine levels plus stigma damages. '1: $250,000.00 for clean-up to a level that would permit current uses to continue .;: $350,000.00 for clean-up to pristine levels only. Question 6 (1 point) Which response best describes the requirement for foreseeability of harm in relation to the tort of negligence? The plaintiff must show that the harm was reasonably foreseeable at the time that the defendant undertook the activity resulting in harm. The onus is on the defendant to prove that the harm in question was not in fact foreseen by them. The plaintiff may show that the harm was reasonably foreseeable based on _' scientific standards and knowledge at the time of the trial. There is no requirement for harm to be foreseeable under the law of negligence