How would you respond to this answer from utilitarian persepctive? "I think this question directly reflects a large point in the libertarians$$ views. A libertarian view is $$a philosophy of personal liberty $$ the liberty of each person to live according to his own choices, providing he does not attempt to coerce others and thus prevent them from living according to their choices.$($Shaw & Barry, $2016,$ p$.114).$ There are many ways the U$.$S$.$ can prevent companies from producing things because they have the power and if everything is not within codes, they can use the impurities to prevent companies from continuing operations. If there is a legal product nothing necessarily wrong with it like a hummer, unless the U$.$S$.$ has factual reasoning that the hummer is a detriment to society or not within codes they are not allowed under law to stop someone from making something because they don't like the product or have issues with the companies involved with the product. They are certainly capable of encouraging their viewpoint on certain products to companies, but they cannot prevent a company from making a legal product unless it is done judicially."