However, when Pat wakes up, Pat is irate and says, "This is a battery. I'm pressing charges. Prison officials touched me, sedated me, and fed me without my consent--all as ordered by Warden Norton!" You're the prosecutor. You receive the file, which includes Pat's satement. You also see an article in the paper in which several family members praised the warden for stepping in. One family member said, "My child, Andy, was about to die, when the warden bravely stepped in--at great risk of lawsuit or prosecution--to save him. Thank you, Warden Norton, from my whole family!" You're trying to decide whether to charge Warden Norton with battery. On one hand, the case is strong; you can prove each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. The thing is, you sort of think the warden did the right thing by saving lives. Yet, it does seem that a crime was committed. So, will you file charges? Hmm. Select the most accurate statement below. Group of answer choices You have discretion here, and you will have to apply normative ethics to help you determine what you ought to do. This is a trick question. You must file charges because a crime has been committed, and you can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a trick question. You are not allowed to file charges when the warden's actions were necessary to save lives. You have discretion here, but you must file charges if the victim demands it