https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-gray-area-with-seanilling/id1081584611?i=1000635406148

Professor Sapolsky's theory: https://theconversation.com/a-stanford-professor-says-science-shows-free-willdoesnt-exist-heres-why-hes-mistaken-218525

How does Professor Robert Sapolsky understand the idea of "free will"?

What are the implications of Professor Sapolsky's theory of free will when applied to the Canadian legal system?

Consider specifically with reference to the examples of Criminal, Contract and Tort Law.

Be specific about the legal concepts, ideas or doctrines you are using to make your argument; and,

Apply course materials to bolster your argument but don't ignore contrary course materials which might challenge your argument (i.e. explain how Professor Sapolsky's thesis would tend to support/undermine the areas of the Canadian legal system you are using as an example forthrightly).