http://www.thecourt.ca/churchill-falls-v-hydro-quebec-serving-contracts-with-a-twist-of-unforeseeability/

Churchill Falls v Hydro-Quebec: Serving Contracts with a Twist of Unforeseeability

(a) Facts (name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, and the judgment)

(b) Issues (what is in dispute)

(c) Holding (the applied rule of law)

(d) Rationale (reasons for the holding

(e) In your opinion, does the court's decision make sense? Give reasons for your opinion.