I am so confused, could u guys help me solve this problem, I just need answer

Rip Towing, Inc. is widely known throughout town as the towing company that causes intentional damage to cars it tows. Lance Landlord sees the car owned by non-resident Grad Student parked on his apartment property again. Lance thinks Grad is trespassing just to get to class early. In fact, Grad is legally parked, visiting a tenant. Lance calls Hip. Sure enough, Hip chains up Grad's car while towing it, intentionally tearing the transmission out of it. ASide from the conversion or trespass issues, Lance's risk of liability to Grad is best supported by: 1. The fact that Ftip committed an intentional tort 2. The respondeat superior doctrine 3. Lance's selection of Rip 4. All of the above Which of the following constitutes a "defect" under strict liability? 1. A chair with the legs designed to be attached with screws and glue, but lacking the screws. 2. A small car designed to have a fuel tank next to the rear axle and unprotected from rupture in a lowspeed collision 3. A flammable liquid bottled in a container without a warning label to warn users of its flammability 4. All of the above