I need help adding this prompt to my essay "Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation - 2021"

My essay:

There are similarities to be seen between LGBTQ+ civil rights campaigns and activities and civil rights movements and actions of other groups, but there are also significant differences. For example, the LGBTQ+ civil rights movement, like previous civil rights movements, aims to achieve public acceptance and awareness of LGBTQ+ individuals, as well as equal rights and legal protection for LGBTQ+ people. Moreover, the legal arguments used in many of the significant rulings addressing LGBTQ+ rights are analogous to the legal arguments advanced in other civil rights issues. For example, the Supreme Court's decision in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989) was based on Section VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was also cited in numerous other civil rights cases. Similarly, the Supreme Court's ruling in Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co. (2006) was based on Title VII, and the decision in Masterpiece Cake v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018) was based on the First Amendment.

Yet, there are a few crucial differences that set the LGBTQ+ civil rights movement apart from prior civil rights campaigns. For example, many of the legal arguments used in LGBTQ+ litigation is predicated on the Fourteenth Amendment, yet the Fourteenth Amendment was not used in previous civil rights cases. Moreover, in the cases of Bostock v. Clayton County Georgia (2020) and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes (2020), the Supreme Court relied on the Strict Scrutiny Test, which is a stricter degree of review than that utilized in earlier civil rights cases. Moreover, the bulk of legal arguments used in LGBTQ+ claims rely on gender identity and sexual orientation, which are not issues addressed in other forms of civil rights disputes.

Making public declarations of inclusiveness and having inclusive corporate policies and benefits may have a positive impact on a company's bottom line and reputation in the marketplace. Making public affirmations of inclusion, for example, may assist in promoting a more diverse and inclusive working environment, which may contribute to increased worker morale and productivity. Moreover, if a firm has inclusive corporate policies and incentives, it may be able to enhance its bottom line by recruiting and maintaining a more diverse workforce in terms of both ability and background. Moreover, by displaying a commitment to diversity and inclusion, making public affirmations of inclusivity may help the organization build closer ties with customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders.

On the other hand, neglecting to make public declarations of inclusion, failing to implement inclusive business rules and benefits, and actively opposing inclusiveness may all have a negative impact on the corporation. At a firm, a hostile working environment may be formed, which may lead to decreased employee morale and productivity, for example, if public remarks of inclusion are not made when they are required. Moreover, if a firm does not have inclusive corporate policies and incentives, it may be less desirable to potential employees, which may be damaging to the organization's bottom line. Moreover, expressing statements against inclusiveness may harm the company's image and make it more difficult to build relationships with customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders inside the business.

In conclusion, the LGBTQ+ civil rights struggle is comparable to earlier civil rights movements in certain ways while also being distinct in other ways. In addition, making public statements of inclusivity and having inclusive corporate policies and benefits can have a positive impact on the business. On the other hand, making statements against inclusivity, not making public statements of inclusivity, and not having inclusive corporate policies and benefits can have a negative impact on the business.