I need help on this assignment. Thanks a lot!!!! Please follow directs attached.

FIN 336 Milestone Three Rubric In Module Five, we are investigating why governments try to intervene in the currency market to keep values of their own currency low. This practice is used to promote the sale of goods to other countries and create additional exports. Here, the purchasing company views the lower value of the foreign currency as a bargain for purchasing goods because the lesser value purchases a larger quantity. In expanding the research and knowledge of the ongoing relationship between the United States and China, write a paper to summarize currency market intervention and decide whether this is a useful tool. Explain your rationale. Cite an example of how intervention has been used to benefit either of these countries and the circumstances surrounding this intervention. Did the United States or China succeed in their efforts? How is this known? Overall, do you believe this was a beneficial choice for the government and country? What data is your opinion based upon? Requirements of Submission: This milestone must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. This paper should be a minimum of 2 pages in length in addition to the title and reference pages. The APA style format must be used when citing and referencing information provided. Provide your name, course number, a title to the paper, and headers and footers where applicable. This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center as an attachment. Critical Elements Currency Market Intervention Intervention Example and Data Analysis Exemplary (100%) Meets \"Proficient\" criteria and thoroughly explains rationale, summarizing currency market invention as a useful tool, with supporting citations Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete and thorough understanding of how currency market intervention has been used to benefit either the United States or China Proficient (85%) Explains rationale, summarizing currency market intervention as a useful tool, with supporting evidence Provides analysis that demonstrates understanding of how currency market Intervention has been used to benefit either the United States or China Needs Improvement (55%) Explains rationale, summarizing currency market intervention as a useful tool; however, explanation has some gaps and misinformation Provides analysis that demonstrates some understanding of how currency market intervention has been used to benefit either the United States or China; however, data used is incorrect or may have some gaps and misinformation Not Evident (0%) Does not explain currency market intervention as a useful tool Value 35 Does not provide analysis of how currency market intervention has been used to benefit either the United States or China 35 Critical Thinking Writing (Mechanics/Citations) Draws insightful conclusions relating to currency market Intervention as a useful tool and how it is used to benefit either the United States or China, with supporting citations No errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence relating to currency market Intervention as a useful tool and how it is used to benefit either the United States or China, with supporting evidence Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Draws logical conclusions relating to currency market Intervention as a useful tool and how it is used to benefit either the United States or China, but does not defend with supporting evidence Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Does not draw logical conclusions or evidence relating to currency market Intervention as a useful tool and how it is used to benefit either the United States or China; does not defend with evidence Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Earned Total 20 10 100%