I need help. The Professor told me this on my first discussion. What i can reply to her about this.?

Thank you for your input. You say, "A detail that strengthens this argument is that most of those 6 judges who voted against, believe that the precedents established by Roe were simply not viable. In other words, this law does not have a strong precedent for not being revised, starting with the premise that abortion is not covered by the United States Constitution". An important point is that it is not the "right to abortion" that was protected in Roe vs Wade is the "right to privacy" of the woman to decide with her doctor to end her unwanted pregnancy.

Prof. Naranjo