i need someone with good grasp of the topic to answer this quetsion

1. Just because no reliable experimental data currently exists on a certain subject does not mean that your educated guess carries the weight of experimental data. For instance, there is currently no experimental evidence telling us what cosmic dark matter is made out of. Scientists can detect dark matter just fine through its gravitational effects but are having difficulty determining exactly what it is. Therefore, stating in an authoritative tone that "dark matter is composed of hydrogen leaking from stars" is non-productive, especially if I try to pass this speculation off as a scientific fact. The power of speculation to misinform gets even worse when an expert in the field is doing the speculating and does not make absolutely clear that he is guessing. Because he is an expert, listeners will just assume everything he says is a summary of solid experimental findings, and will even pass his comment on as such. The pattern goes something like this: Dr. AstroExpert holds an interview with Mr. Journalist in which Mr. Journalist (in the interest of a sensational interview) is able to coax Dr. AstroExpert into freely speculating. The headline of the interview becomes something like, "Dr. AstroExpert claims dark matter comes from leaks in the sun." Readers then pass along this statement to all their friends as if it were a recently-established scientific fact instead of the unreliable speculation that it is. Since speculation is so often wrong and so easily confused with actual results, most academic journals publish only experimental results and well-developed theories that match experimental results; not speculation.
2. Speculating in areas where scientific measurements can't be made.
3. Many areas are simply outside the realm of scientific measurements and belong more in the fields of abstract philosophy or religion. For instance, questions such as "What is the purpose of life?" or "What happened before the Big Bang?" can't be answered using purely scientific methods. As such, any answer to these questions in a scientific setting is going to be highly unreliable speculation.

quetsiosn

1.since time immemorial in financing, analyse how The Loanable Funds Theory have been objectified to invisibility

2.relate the disbursement over time of finance to the Transactions demand for money

3.as explained in fianc, explain how active balances can be analysed by the monetary policy of the . Precautionary Demand for Money with evidence

4.sepculatethedemand for money and financesto capture the motivation of access to the treasurybills

5.converse the evidencing the demographic change to the population and the impact to the financialsector

6.generatethe consequences of the Causes of changes in the Rate of Growth to the per capita changes in finance

7. what are the justification of the bold explanation of the theory of T.R. Malthus

Regarding finance

8.how does the frequent remuneration influence finance ?

9.to what Extent to Barriers to Entry into a Particular Occupation can have a significant implication towards the Life expectancy and finance?

10.how is above situation different in developed countries?