I need the answer the following question

Q.1

X, a client promises to pay Y, his advocate Rs.30, 000 in addition to his fees if X succeeds. X succeeds but refuses to pay Rs.30, 000. Can Y recover from X? Yes or No? Justify with legal reasoning with correct concept according to Contract Act, 1872. (5) Marks

Q2.

Ahmed purchased some items from the claimant jeweler shop claiming to be Mr. Farooq Khan, a famous industrialist. He paid by cheque and persuaded the jeweler to allow him to take a ring immediately as he claimed it was his wife's birthday the following day. He gave the address of Farooq Khan's office and the jeweler checked the name, which matched the address in Yellow Pages. Ahmed then pawned the ring at the defendant pawnbrokers in the name of Mr. Yaqoob and received Rs.50, 000. He then disappeared without a trace. The claimant brought an action based on unilateral mistake as to identity.

Discuss the legal position with regard to the following points:

a) What type of mistake occurred?

b) Whether there was a contract or not? If yes, please explain

c) As a judge, how would you interpret and decide the case?

(5) Marks

Q3.

Kiran chose her favourite 8 dresses from a well-known clothing brand, in a rush hour sale-day, which she thought were, were reasonably priced. On the sale counter, the cashier refused to accept payment and politely asked her to leave the items. Kiran sued the brand for breach of contract. Can she succeed in her aim? Yes or No? Discuss the legal position as per the Contract Act 1872.

(5) Marks

Q4.

Salman, who was badly in need of money offered to sell his car worth Rs.1 Million to Saif for Rs.10, 000. Before the car was delivered, Salman received an offer of 2 Lacs and refused to carry out the contract on the ground of inadequacy of consideration. Is Salman liable to Saif for damages? Yes or No? Justify with legal reasoning with correct concept according to Contract Act, 1872. (5) Marks

Q5.

Aslam offered sell his car for Rs. 1 Million to Ahmed. Ahmed replies, " I will pay Rs. 9 Lacs for it. "Aslam refuses to sell at this price. Ahmed then accepts the original price but Aslam still refuses. Is Aslam bound by Ahmed's acceptance and can Ahmed lodge a suit? Discuss the legal position as per the Contract Act 1872.(5) Marks

Q.6

Sultan promises to pay Rs. 1 Million to Yaseen in order to induce him to retire so as to provide room for Sultan's appointment to the public office held by Yaseen. Is agreement valid? Yes or No? Discuss the legal position as per the Contract Act 1872.(5) Marks