i need the answers please

Working for Eli Lilly & Company B efore a newly discovered drug is approved for sale, the U.S. Food and Drug Adminis- tration (FDA) requires that it be tested on healthy humans to determine whether it has dan- gerous side effects. Unfortunately, most healthy people will not take an untested substance that is not intended to cure them of anything and that may have crippling or deadly effects. Test subjects can die; suffer paralysis, organ damage, and other chronically debilitating injuries. Eli Lilly, a large pharmaceutical company, however, discovered a group of "volunteers" willing to take untested drugs for only $85 a day plus free room and board: home- less alcoholics desperate for money recruited in soup kitchens, shelters, and jails. Since tests run for months, the men can make as much as $4,500-a hefty sum to someone surviving on handouts. The tests provide enormous benefits for society and many tests might not be performed at all but for the pool of homeless alcoholics. Moreover, providing the men with a warm bed, food, and good medical care before sending them out drug-and alcohol-free and with money in their pockets seems beneficial. The FDA requires that participants in such medical tests must give their "informed consent" and make a "truly voluntary and uncoerced decision." Some question whether the desperate circumstances of hungry, homeless, and penniless alcoholics allow them to make a truly voluntary and uncoerced de- cision. When asked, one homeless drinker hired to participate in a test said he had no idea what kind of drug was being tested on him even though he had signed an informed-consent form. 1. Discuss Eli Lilly's practice from the per- spectives of utilitarianism and rights. 2. In your judgment, is the policy of using homeless alcoholics for test subjects morally appropriate