I saw on your pages that this asignement has been answer, how true is that. Assignment is attached below

Resit Coursework Assignment Brief Semester: A16 Module Code: PM106 Module Title: Introduction to Accounting Programme BSc (Honours) Level: Level 4 Awarding Body: University of Plymouth Module Leader Dalene Matthews Format: Report Presentation: No Any special requirements: All work should be submitted on the Student Portal along with a Turnitin Report below 20%. The assignment should be submitted on an individual basis. Please do not form any groups. Word Limit: 2,500 words (with 10% plus or minus leeway). This must be strictly adhered to, 10% marks will be lost if not adhered to. Deadline date for submission: Tuesday 26th April 2016 Learning outcomes to be examined in this assessment Calculate and provide an interpretation of the financial results of an organisation listed on the FTSE 100 using ratio analysis. Percentage of marks awarded for module: This assignment is worth 50% of the total marks for the module Assessment criteria Explanatory comments on the assessment criteria Constructive critical analysis. Accurate calculation of applicable ratio's. Maximum marks for each section Relevant, accurate content, demonstrating 70% research, as required by the assessment task. Coherent and clear discussion of the issues facing the business. 1 Clear comparison between each of the periods and comparison between the industry average. Correct calculation of financial ratio's. Full in-text referencing using the Harvard citation style. Structured reference list or bibliography using the Harvard referencing method Referencing Style 10% Content, style, relevance, originality Clear demonstration of rigorous research from recognised authoritative sources. Audience focus; report format. 5% Introduction, conclusion and recommendation 15% Coherent and concise introduction, conclusion and clear recommendations 2 Assignment Task: Choose two of the UK'S Top three Telecoms companies from the list provided (Vodafone, BT Group & BSKYB) and download the companies' annual reports from the following links: http://www.http://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/financials? s=BT:NYQ&subView=IncomeStatement http://www.http://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/financials? s=VOD:LSE&subview=IncomeStatement http://www.http://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/financials?s=SKY:LSE Produce the 2013, 2014 and 2015 ratio table for the companies you have chosen from the list above (Profitability, Liquidity and Efficiency ratios as performed in class.) Based on these ratios and any other additional information available from the annual reports, compile a report comparing the performance of the companies selected. Total marks for assignment: 100 3 What is expected within students' answers Please write up your comments in no more than 2500 words (Times New Roman, 11 font, single spaced). All work in excess of 2500 words will be penalised. Demonstrate the ability to relate theory to the real world. Marks awarded Introduction 5 Analysis/comparison of the performance of the two companies 40 Calculation of ratios (Profitability, Liquidity and Efficiency) 30 Conclusion and Recommendation 10 Content, style, relevance, originality 5 Format, referencing, bibliography 10 TOTAL MARKS 100 4 Standard marking system for use when marking coursework assignments for all programmes at GSM. Indicative Grade Distinction UK% marks 70%+ Characteristics. Very high standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks. Excellent understanding and exposition of relevant issues. Clearly structured and logically developed arguments. Good awareness of nuances and complexities. Substantial evidence of well-executed independent research. Excellent evaluation and synthesis of source material. Merit 60-69% Relevant data and examples, all properly referenced. High standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks. Clear awareness and exposition of relevant issues. Clearly structure and logically developed argument. Awareness of nuances and complexities. Evidence of independent research. Good evaluation and synthesis of source material. Pass 50-59% Relevant data and examples, all properly referenced. Uses appropriate conceptual frameworks. Attempts analysis but includes some errors and / or omissions. Shows awareness of issues but no more than to be expected room attendance at classes. 5 Arguments reasonably clear but underdeveloped. Insufficient evidence of independent research. Insufficient evaluation of source material. Pass 40-49% Some good use of relevant data and examples but incompletely referenced. Adequate understanding of appropriate conceptual frameworks. Answer too descriptive and or any attempt at analysis is superficial containing errors and omission. Shows limited awareness of issues but also some confusion. Arguments not particularly clear. Limited evidence of independent research and reliance on a superficial repeat of class notes. Relatively superficial use of relevant data sources and examples poorly referenced. 6