I urge you to read the substantive case before attempting to answer the question.

$.$Austin Rare Coins, Inc., buys and sells rare coins, bullion, and other precious metals through eight Web sites with different domain names. An unknown individual took control of Austin$$s servers and transferred the domain names to another registrant without Austin$$s permission. The new registrant began using the domain names to host malicious content$$including hate letters to customers and fraudulent contact information$$and to post customers$$credit$-$card numbers and other private information, thereby tarnishing Austin$$s goodwill. Austin filed a suit in a federal district court against the new registrant under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. Is Austin entitled to a transfer of the domain names? Explain. $[$Austin Rare Coins, Inc. v$.$Acoins$.$com, $\_\_$F$.$Supp$\mathrm{.}2$d $\_\_,2013$WL $85142($E$.$D$.$Va$.2013)]$

subject is Law please provide correct solution.