I was wondering if it's possible to get the answers for the mountain state sporting goods case?

Present a Discussion of Mr. Hess's Roles, Duties, and Responsibilities. This phase of the engagement requires to address these concerns with meaningful discussion of Mr. Hess's activities, including references to Rules 101, 201, and 202. Was Mr. Hess independent with respect to the 2009 meeting with the BOD? Did Mr. Hess meet the following requirements: - Professional competence; - Due professional care; - Planning and supervision; - Sufficient relevant data. Present Recommendations for Resolution and Remediation. Discussion should consider the following: How strong is the evidence? Have any alternative explanations been identified? Should a criminal complaint be field? If so, against whom? Should a civil complaint be field? If so, against whom? Should alternative dispute resolution (ADR) be considered