identify the issue, identify and discuss the rule(s) of law and then applying the facts of the case to the rule(s) of law to reach a conclusion. More weight will be given your argument supporting your conclusion than to the conclusion itself.

Big Corporation, a steel manufacturer, owned and operated a manufacturing plant. Big Corporation hired Youngstown Security Patrol, Inc. (YSP), a security company, to guard Big Corporations property and deter thieves and vandals. Some YSP security guards carried firearms. Eric Bator, a YSP security guard, was not certified as an armed guard but nevertheless took his gun in a brief case to work. While working at the Big Corporation plant, Bator fired his gun at Derrell Pusey, in the belief that Pusey was an intruder. The bullet struck and killed Pusey. Puseys mother filed suit against Big Corporation and others, alleging in part that her sons death was the result of YSPs negligence, for which Big Corporation was responsible. What legal arguments will each side make? What is the likely outcome of this case and why?