1. Identify the most important point in the article.
2. Determine what evidence in the article supports this point in the article. In addition, identify anything that may contradict the point.
3. How useful are the variables in the study? How well are they measured?
4. Does the study separate correlation from causation?
5. Determine ways our required course readings support or contradict the author's findings.
6. Identify the underlying assumptions made about the subject matter in the article.
7. Determine whether the author's points are indicative of your experiences as an employee. If you are not currently an employee, speculate on how they may reflect your future experiences.
8. Identify new concepts/insights the article provided you and make a statement about the value of this new information. If you did not learn anything new from the article, explain why (i.e., have you encountered these concepts previously in some detail?).
9. Describe any questions the article generated about the topic/field.

1. In regards to the article Marketing and Public Policy Implications of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization by Fitzgerald, Renzelli Cain, etc
2. Article link

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003486/